MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199808673 · doi:10.4000/espacepolitique.9388

La délimitation maritime en mer de Beaufort, entre immobilisme et indifférence ?

2021· article· fr· W3199808673 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marine Boulanger, Frédèric Lasserre

Bibliographic record

VenueL’Espace Politique · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesBeaufort scalePolitical scienceForestryGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plusieurs revendications sur des espaces maritimes en Arctique se traduisent par des litiges entre États riverains, même si nombre de disputes ont été résolues à travers des négociations. Parmi ces litiges, on retrouve le différend entre États-Unis et Canada portant sur les limites de leur Zone Économique Exclusive en mer de Beaufort. Il s’agit d’un litige relativement ancien (1977) et qui, malgré les relations cordiales entre Ottawa et Washington, ne semble pas connaitre de solution. Cet article se propose d’analyser la situation en mer de Beaufort, afin d’évoquer des clefs de réflexion sur le pourquoi de la pérennisation de ce différend. Il s’agit de proposer une lecture synthétique d’éléments juridiques et de documents gouvernementaux permettant de rendre compte du faible empressement des gouvernements à résoudre ce litige de basse intensité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL’Espace PolitiqueSame topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207