MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199833465 · doi:10.1504/ijris.2021.10041242

Development of IoT-based smart agriculture monitoring system for red radish plants production

2021· article· en· W3199833465 on OpenAlexaff
Chunsheng Yang, Ari Aharari

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Reasoning-based Intelligent Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureProduction (economics)Successor cardinalGreen RevolutionBusinessAutomationAgricultural economicsInternet of ThingsPopulationAgricultural engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringGeographyEconomicsMathematicsComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The world population is increasing at a fast rate, and as results need for food is also growing briskly. The traditional method of agriculture is not sufficient enough to cover the needs of the market. On the other hand, the aging of agricultural workers has progressed rapidly, and the successor problem is becoming more serious. Under such circumstances are coming out also new farmers that will help the beginner to agriculture. However, the establishment of farming technology has become a significant management challenge for new farmers. In this paper, we focused on automation in agriculture by applying IoT technologies. The proposed system is utilising to monitor the environmental information during the experiment of producing the red radish. The sensor data is analysed to find the relation between ecological parameters and the growth results. The result of the proposed system was satisfactory as the first step in much deep measure development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Reasoning-based Intelligent SystemsSame topicSmart Agriculture and AIFrench-language works237,207