MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199936014 · doi:10.34133/2021/9846158

Global Wheat Head Detection 2021: An Improved Dataset for Benchmarking Wheat Head Detection Methods

2021· article· en· W3199936014 on OpenAlexafffund
Étienne David, Mario Serouart, Daniel Smith, Simon Madec, Kaaviya Velumani, Shouyang Liu, Xu Wang, Francisco Pinto, Shahameh Shafiee, Izzat Sidahmed Ali Tahir, Hisashi Tsujimoto, Shuhei Nasuda, Bangyou Zheng, Norbert Kirchgeßner, Helge Aasen, Andreas Hund, Pouria Sadeghi‐Tehran, Koichi Nagasawa, Goro Ishikawa, Sébastien Dandrifosse, Alexis Carlier, Benjamin Dumont, Benoît Mercatoris, Byron Evers, Ken Kuroki, Haozhou Wang, Masanori Ishii, Minhajul Arifin Badhon, Curtis Pozniak, David LeBauer, Morten Lillemo, Jesse Poland, Scott Chapman, Benoît de Solan, Frédéric Baret, Ian Stavness, Wei Guo

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Phenomics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilAssociation Nationale de la Recherche et de la TechnologieGrains Research and Development CorporationAgence Nationale de la RechercheUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsBenchmarkingComputer scienceReliability (semiconductor)Competition (biology)Head (geology)RGB color modelArtificial intelligenceData scienceBusinessMarketingBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Global Wheat Head Detection (GWHD) dataset was created in 2020 and has assembled 193,634 labelled wheat heads from 4700 RGB images acquired from various acquisition platforms and 7 countries/institutions. With an associated competition hosted in Kaggle, GWHD_2020 has successfully attracted attention from both the computer vision and agricultural science communities. From this first experience, a few avenues for improvements have been identified regarding data size, head diversity, and label reliability. To address these issues, the 2020 dataset has been reexamined, relabeled, and complemented by adding 1722 images from 5 additional countries, allowing for 81,553 additional wheat heads. We now release in 2021 a new version of the Global Wheat Head Detection dataset, which is bigger, more diverse, and less noisy than the GWHD_2020 version.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations150
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant PhenomicsSame topicSmart Agriculture and AIFrench-language works237,207