MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3199941887 · doi:10.26685/urncst.278

Resurrecting the Dead: Mitigating Efflux-Pump Inhibitor Toxicity using a Liposomal Delivery System to Recover Efficacy of Antimicrobial Drugs

2021· article· en· W3199941887 on OpenAlexaff
Prachi Ray, Kha Nguyen, Nguyễn Xuân Trường, Sukriti Sachdev

Bibliographic record

VenueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEffluxAntimicrobialPseudomonas aeruginosaMicrobiologyAntibioticsViability assayLiposomeEthidium bromideMultiple drug resistancePharmacologyMinimum inhibitory concentrationCytotoxicityBacteriaToxicityAntibiotic resistanceChemistryBiologyBiochemistryCellIn vitroDNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become concerningly prevalent on a global scale as many infectious agents have evolved to evade antimicrobials effects, making it difficult to treat infectious diseases. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a multiresistant bacteria that requires urgent attention as it is detrimental in lung infections, particularly in individuals with cystic fibrosis. Activity of membrane-embedded efflux pumps, such as the MexAB-OprM pump, is a principal mechanism by which bacterial species become resistant to antimicrobials. Efflux pump inhibitors (EPIs) have recently emerged as a strategy to prevent the expulsion of administered antimicrobials, thereby resensitizing resistant bacteria to antibiotics. Phenylalanine‐arginine β‐naphthylamide (PAβN) is an EPI that inhibits a number of different pumps, including the MexAB‐OprM efflux system. Despite EPIs providing a partial solution to AMR, they have been shown to be toxic to humans, which has impeded their entry into clinical application. We propose that by inserting the PAβN into a liposomal delivery system, the cytotoxic effects against human cells will be lowered without decreasing the EPI’s inhibitory activity. Methods: To test this, resistant P. aeruginosa strains will be administered with liposomal-encased PAβN and ampicillin to measure efflux activity and inhibited growth, whereas human pulmonary epithelial cells will be exposed to liposomal-encased PAβN to study cell viability. Results: Liposomal EPI are expected to maintain inhibitory activity and resistant bacteria would become re-susceptible to antibiotics when treated with the liposomal EPI. Discussion: By analyzing efflux rate to measure the liposomal EPI’s activity, its activity level should be comparable to free EPI. The resensitization assay would be interpreted to show that the bacteria are susceptible to antibiotics again. Conclusion: If effective, EPIs may become a potential therapeutic to combat AMR in infections by reviving the use of antimicrobials that have become ineffective. Restoring the activity of already approved antibiotics through potential co-administration with liposome-encapsulated EPIs will be a cost-effective and worthwhile approach to combat AMR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal→Same topicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria→French-language works237,207→