MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199962566 · doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2021.09.007

A Prevention Approach to Reducing Gender-Based Harassment and Discrimination in Cardiovascular Medicine

2021· editorial· en· W3199962566 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rachel Eikelboom, Sonia S. Anand

Bibliographic record

VenueCJC Open · 2021
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiversity and Career in Medicine
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarassmentMedicinePsychologyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gender harassment (physical or verbal behaviour, such as bullying) and discrimination (being treated differently on the basis of gender) are rampant in healthcare. Gender discrimination in the workplace has 4 key manifestations: creation of a hostile work environment, a gender pay gap, inequalities in career advancement, and imbalanced representation in leadership. Half of the women in healthcare training or academic healthcare witness or experience unprofessional behaviour.1 One in 2 female medical students (compared to 1 in 5 male medical students),2 and 1 in 3 female physicians (compared to 4% of male physicians)3 experience sexual harassment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCJC OpenSame topicDiversity and Career in MedicineFrench-language works237,207