MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199964244 · doi:10.1049/gtd2.12285

Parallel‐in‐time‐and‐space electromagnetic transient simulation of multi‐terminal DC grids with device‐level switch modelling

2021· article· en· W3199964244 on OpenAlexaff
Tianshi Cheng, Ning Lin, Tian Liang, Venkata Dinavahi

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Generation Transmission & Distribution · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)Terminal (telecommunication)Electromagnetic simulationComputer scienceElectrical engineeringTransient analysisElectronic engineeringTransient responseEngineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The electromagnetic transient (EMT) simulation of multi‐terminal DC (MTDC) grids requires a detailed device‐level modular multilevel converter (MMC) model, which can have thousands of state variables and complex internal structures. The fast device‐level insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) transient requires a very small time‐step, making the computational overhead prohibitive. Based on the analysis of the parallel‐in‐time (PiT) implementation of detailed modelled MMCs, this paper proposes a task‐based hybrid PiT algorithm to achieve high parallel efficiency and speed‐up of MMC with device‐level modelling. Moreover, a transmission line model(TLM)‐based parallel‐in‐time‐and‐space (PiT+PiS) method is proposed to connect PiT grids to conventional or other PiT grids and exploit the maximum parallelism. Simulation results show greater than 30 speed‐up and 60% parallel efficiency on a 48 cores computer for the hybrid PiT method in a 201‐level three‐phase MMC test case, and 20 speed‐up in the transient simulation of CIGRÉ B4 DC grid test system for the PiT+PiS method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score0.755

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Generation Transmission & DistributionSame topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207