MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200016726 · doi:10.21423/aabppro20143714

effects of flunixin meglumine treatment and hoof trimming on lying behavior and locomotion in dairy cows

2014· article· en· W3200016726 on OpenAlexaff
N. M. Chapel, Lauren L Hulsman Hanna, N. Chapinal, Sarah Wagner

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLamenessHoofClawMedicineTrimmingDairy cattleGaitAnimal scienceAnimal welfareLyingDrug treatmentPhysical medicine and rehabilitationAnatomyInternal medicineSurgeryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lameness is a common disorder in US dairy herds and a welfare concern. Compared to non-lame cows, lame cows spend more time lying down. Although regular hoof trimming is often a component of lameness prevention efforts, increased lying time has been observed following hoof trimming, suggesting that it may cause discomfort in dairy cows. Preliminary work suggested that treatment with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug decreases the duration of increased lying time after hoof trimming. The objective of this study was to examine interactions between lameness, hoof trimming, and non-steroidal drug therapy. Our hypothesis was that cows treated with flunixin meglumine before and after hoof trimming would spend less time lying, have improved gait scores, and produce more milk than cows that had their hooves trimmed without concurrent drug treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference ProceedingsSame topicAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207