MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200154223 · doi:10.32870/eera.vi32.675

Las implicaciones sociales de la privatización del agua

2014· article· es· W3200154223 on OpenAlexaff
Abril Casas Cervantes

Bibliographic record

VenueExpresión Económica · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Resource Management and Quality
Canadian institutionsContinental (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Entre las soluciones más controversiales para combatir la escasez de agua en algunas regiones se encuentra la privatización del servicio. Tal controversia se basa en las implicaciones sociales que esta solución trae consigo y que pocas veces son consideradas por los tomadores de decisiones. Aquellos que defienden el servicio público del agua, mencionan que existen poderosos argumentos en contra de la privatización, entre ellos la disolución del derecho humano al agua; la omisión de valores democráticos fundamentales, como la participación; y la disolución del papel del ciudadano bajo una lógica de cliente.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.026
Scholarly communication0.0110.004
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpresión EconómicaSame topicWater Resource Management and QualityFrench-language works237,207