On the Efficiency of Subclass Knowledge Distillation in Classification Tasks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work introduces a novel knowledge distillation framework for classification tasks where information on existing subclasses is available and taken into consideration. In classification tasks with a small number of classes or binary detection (two classes) the amount of information transferred from the teacher to the student network is restricted, thus limiting the utility of knowledge distillation. Performance can be improved by leveraging information about possible subclasses within the available classes in the classification task. To that end, we propose the so-called Subclass Knowledge Distillation (SKD) framework, which is the process of transferring the subclasses' prediction knowledge from a large teacher model into a smaller student one. Through SKD, additional meaningful information which is not in the teacher's class logits but exists in subclasses (e.g., similarities inside classes) will be conveyed to the student and boost its performance. Mathematically, we measure how many extra information bits the teacher can provide for the student via SKD framework. The framework developed is evaluated in clinical application, namely colorectal polyp binary classification. In this application, clinician-provided annotations are used to define subclasses based on the annotation label's variability in a curriculum style of learning. A lightweight, low complexity student trained with the proposed framework achieves an F1-score of 85.05%, an improvement of 2.14% and 1.49% gain over the student that trains without and with conventional knowledge distillation, respectively. These results show that the extra subclasses' knowledge (i.e., 0.4656 label bits per training sample in our experiment) can provide more information about the teacher generalization, and therefore SKD can benefit from using more information to increase the student performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".