Bridging The Gap Between East And West: Patriarchal Ascendancy On The South Asian Women Presented In Anita Desai' Diamond Dust
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research seeks to explore female's voices in Anita Desai's collection of stories, Diamond Dust. The plot of the various stories moves from rustic places in India to cosmopolitan cities of the West. It depicts the status of females in both rustic India and cosmopolitan life in western societies. The plight of women in eastern societies is dominated by male chauvinism where women are submissive. The present research deals with the variations in women living in the oriental life and occidental life representing Indian as well as western norms especially in America and Canada. The research concentrates on the status of females in Indian culture and western culture focusing on how they are treated differently although the common biological characteristics are almost the same. To find variation in the treatment of women 'feminism' is used as a tool in the research. It is clear that females have been secondary citizens in the West, and continue to be so even today. Similarly, in Oriental culture, the condition of females is not different from that of the Occidental. This research is qualitative in nature. Theories presented by Kate Millet, Elaine Showalter, and Simone de Beauvoir help to find the answers of the research questions for this research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".