MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Strongly-interacting ultralight millicharged particles

2021· article· en· W3200213012 on OpenAlexaff
Stephon Alexander, Evan McDonough, David N. Spergel

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Letters B · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsDark matterParticle physicsScalar field dark matterLight dark matterHot dark matterDark fluidCold dark matterBaryonic dark matterCuspy halo problemAstrophysicsMixed dark matterWarm dark matterQCD matterBaryonBaryon asymmetryDark matter haloQuantum chromodynamicsStrange matterHaloNuclear physicsGalaxyCosmologyDark energyLepton

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the implications of an ultra-light fermionic dark matter candidate that carries baryon number. This naturally arises if dark matter has a small charge under standard model baryon number whilst having an asymmetry equal and opposite to that in the visible universe. A prototypical model is a theory of dark baryons of a non-Abelian gauge group, i.e., a dark Quantum Chromo-Dynamics (QCD). For sub-eV dark baryon masses, the inner region of dark matter halos is naturally at ‘nuclear density’, allowing for the formation of exotic states of matter, akin to neutron stars. The Tremaine-Gunn lower bound on the mass of fermionic dark matter, i.e., the dark baryons, is violated by the strong short-range self-interactions, cooling via emission of light dark pions, and the Cooper pairing of dark quarks that occurs at densities that are high relative to the (ultra-low) dark QCD scale. We develop the astrophysics of these STrongly-interacting Ultra-light Millicharged Particles (STUMPs) utilizing the equation of state of dense quark matter, and find halo cores consistent with observations of dwarf galaxies. These cores are prevented from core-collapse by pressure of the ‘neutron star’, which suggests ultra-light dark QCD as a resolution to core-cusp problem of collisionless cold dark matter. The model is distinguished from ultra-light bosonic dark matter through direct detection and collider signatures, as well as by phenomena associated with superconductivity, such as Andreev reflection and superconducting vortices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics Letters BSame topicDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207