MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Strongly-interacting ultralight millicharged particles

2021· article· en· W3200213012 on OpenAlexaff
Stephon Alexander, Evan McDonough, David N. Spergel

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Letters B · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsDark matterParticle physicsScalar field dark matterLight dark matterHot dark matterDark fluidCold dark matterBaryonic dark matterCuspy halo problemAstrophysicsMixed dark matterWarm dark matterQCD matterBaryonBaryon asymmetryDark matter haloQuantum chromodynamicsStrange matterHaloNuclear physicsGalaxyCosmologyDark energyLepton

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the implications of an ultra-light fermionic dark matter candidate that carries baryon number. This naturally arises if dark matter has a small charge under standard model baryon number whilst having an asymmetry equal and opposite to that in the visible universe. A prototypical model is a theory of dark baryons of a non-Abelian gauge group, i.e., a dark Quantum Chromo-Dynamics (QCD). For sub-eV dark baryon masses, the inner region of dark matter halos is naturally at ‘nuclear density’, allowing for the formation of exotic states of matter, akin to neutron stars. The Tremaine-Gunn lower bound on the mass of fermionic dark matter, i.e., the dark baryons, is violated by the strong short-range self-interactions, cooling via emission of light dark pions, and the Cooper pairing of dark quarks that occurs at densities that are high relative to the (ultra-low) dark QCD scale. We develop the astrophysics of these STrongly-interacting Ultra-light Millicharged Particles (STUMPs) utilizing the equation of state of dense quark matter, and find halo cores consistent with observations of dwarf galaxies. These cores are prevented from core-collapse by pressure of the ‘neutron star’, which suggests ultra-light dark QCD as a resolution to core-cusp problem of collisionless cold dark matter. The model is distinguished from ultra-light bosonic dark matter through direct detection and collider signatures, as well as by phenomena associated with superconductivity, such as Andreev reflection and superconducting vortices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.638

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics Letters BSame topicDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207