MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200213478 · doi:10.4000/books.puam.5099

Aspects juridiques et pratiques du contrat d’affrètement et du contrat de transport

2016· book-chapter· fr· W3200213478 on OpenAlexaff
Kamel Khelifa

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires d’Aix-Marseille eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Transports
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I. Les contrats d’affrètement A. Définitions légales Aux termes de son art 640, le Code Maritime Algérien (CMA) stipule : « le contrat d’affrètement s’entend d’une convention par laquelle le fréteur s’en­gage moyennant rémunération à mettre un navire à la disposition d’un affréteur […] ». En son titre III, le Code de Commerce Tunisien (CCM), traitant des règles générales du contrat d’affrètement définit, en son art 165, le contrat d’affrètement comme étant « une convention par laquelle une ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires d’Aix-Marseille eBooksSame topicHealth, Medicine and SocietyFrench-language works237,207