MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200258902 · doi:10.1089/brain.2021.0062

Stress-Induced Changes in Effective Connectivity During Regulation of the Emotional Response to Threat

2021· article· en· W3200258902 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adam M. Goodman, Muriah D. Wheelock, Nathaniel G. Harnett, Elizabeth Davis, Sylvie Mrug, Gopikrishna Deshpande, David C. Knight

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Connectivity · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicStress Responses and Cortisol
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institute on Aging
KeywordsNeurosciencePsychologyFight-or-flight responseFunctional connectivityCognitive psychologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Stress-related disruption of emotion regulation appears to involve the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and amygdala. However, the interactions between brain regions that mediate stress-induced changes in emotion regulation remain unclear. The present study builds upon prior work that assessed stress-induced changes in the neurobehavioral response to threat by investigating effective connectivity between these brain regions. Methods: Participants completed the Montreal Imaging Stress Task followed by a Pavlovian fear conditioning procedure during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Stress ratings and psychophysiological responses were used to assess stress reactivity. Effective connectivity during fear conditioning was identified using multivariate autoregressive modeling. Effective connectivity values were calculated during threat presentations that were either predictable (preceded by a warning cue) or unpredictable (no warning cue). Results: A neural hub within the dorsomedial PFC (dmPFC) showed greater effective connectivity to other PFC regions, inferior parietal lobule, insula, and amygdala during predictable than unpredictable threat. The dmPFC also showed greater connectivity to different dorsolateral PFC and amygdala regions during unpredictable than predictable threat. Stress ratings varied with connectivity differences from the dmPFC to the amygdala. Connectivity from dmPFC to amygdala was greater in general during unpredictable than predictable threat, however, this connectivity increased during predictable compared with unpredictable threat as stress reactivity increased. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that acute stress disrupts connectivity underlying top-down emotion regulation of the threat response. Furthermore, increased connectivity between the dmPFC and amygdala may play a critical role in stress-induced changes in the emotional response to threat. Impact statement The present study builds upon prior work that assessed stress-induced changes in the human neurobehavioral response to threat by demonstrating that increased top-down connectivity from the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex to the amygdala varies with individual differences in stress reactivity. These findings provide novel evidence in humans of stress-induced disruption of a specific top-down corticolimbic circuit during active emotion regulation processes, which may play a causal role in the long-term effects of chronic or excessive stress exposure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain ConnectivitySame topicStress Responses and CortisolFrench-language works237,207