A new formation model of the Atlantic-Arctic heterochronous rifting system: A concept and basic provisions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new formation model of the global Atlantic-Arctic heterochronous rifting system is substantiated, according to which the Central and North Atlantics, Labrador-Baffin seas, and Arctic Ocean represent morpho-tectonic elements of different orders of the united recent Atlantic-Arctic Ocean. Evolution of the global rift system of this ocean includes three stages: the first stage (D–J1) was expressed by establishment of a tectonic zone in the lithosphere of Pangea with formation of the ophiolite ultrabasite-gabbro association; the second stage (J1–₽1) represented stretching of the continental crust to form depressions and uplifts with areal manifestation of trap magmatism of Cretaceous and other ages; and the third one (₽2–present) is neotectonic-magmatic reactivation with formation of a middle ridge, that is being accompanied by outpouring of glassy basalts and by hydrothermal manifestations. Within the framework of this model, the history of formation is reconstructed of the Eurasian Basin and the Gakkel Ridge, that were included in the Russia's updated application for expansion of the outer continental shelf border.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".