MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200321696

Increasing the Quality and Diversity of Ontario Cider Through Characterization of Novel Saccharomyces Yeast and Nitrogen Supplementation Regimens

2021· dissertation· en· W3200321696 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jordan Hofstra

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFermentation and Sensory Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYeastDiversity (politics)Saccharomyces cerevisiaeQuality (philosophy)Food scienceBiotechnologyNitrogenBiologyChemistryBiochemistrySociologyPhysicsAnthropologyOrganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cider has experienced a rise in popularity in the province of Ontario. Industrial fermentation of dessert apples (Malus domestica Borkh.) by domesticated Saccharomyces wine yeast is the preferred production method of Ontario cideries. Here, four novel Saccharomyces yeasts were isolated and characterized based on their ability to ferment apple must. The fermentation kinetics of all four novel strains were also compared under five different nitrogen supplementation regimens. The isolates differed in their consumption of cider sugars although all successfully completed fermentations. Supplementing with amino acids or diammonium phosphate (DAP) caused an increase in must attenuation compared to no nitrogen addition. The addition of amino acids or DAP 72 hours into the fermentation enabled several isolates and industrial yeasts to increase the production of fruity-associated flavour compounds such as higher alcohols and esters. Overall, the findings provide Ontario cideries with new resources to sustain continued growth of the already burgeoning industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicFermentation and Sensory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207