Le parcours de Denis Lambin (1519-1572), précurseur de la « Slow Science » ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Denis Lambin (1519-1572) offre un parcours intéressant, et la méthode qu’il élabore patiemment, au service d’éditions très réputées, n’est pas sans rappeler les revendications actuelles des tenants de la Slow Science. Issu d’un milieu artisan, il connaît plusieurs périodes de formation en France et en Italie, aux cours desquelles il développe un large et précieux réseau, avant de devenir « lecteur royal » à Paris – à plus de 40 ans. Ses célèbres éditions (Horace, Cicéron, Lucrèce…) datent toutes des dix dernières années de sa vie et sont le fruit du travail patient d’un philologue soucieux d’offrir à ses étudiants et à ses lecteurs – quitte à « lambiner » – le meilleur du savoir de son temps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".