MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200332838 · doi:10.4000/diasporas.5065

Le parcours de Denis Lambin (1519-1572), précurseur de la « Slow Science » ?

2020· article· fr· W3200332838 on OpenAlexaff
Astrid Quillien

Bibliographic record

VenueDiasporas · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Denis Lambin (1519-1572) offre un parcours intéressant, et la méthode qu’il élabore patiemment, au service d’éditions très réputées, n’est pas sans rappeler les revendications actuelles des tenants de la Slow Science. Issu d’un milieu artisan, il connaît plusieurs périodes de formation en France et en Italie, aux cours desquelles il développe un large et précieux réseau, avant de devenir « lecteur royal » à Paris – à plus de 40 ans. Ses célèbres éditions (Horace, Cicéron, Lucrèce…) datent toutes des dix dernières années de sa vie et sont le fruit du travail patient d’un philologue soucieux d’offrir à ses étudiants et à ses lecteurs – quitte à « lambiner » – le meilleur du savoir de son temps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiasporasSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207