MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200366437 · doi:10.29173/slw6849

The Researcher's Perspective From Face- to-Face to Distance Education: The Story of Two Canadian School Library Educators

2013· article· en· W3200366437 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jennifer Branch, Joanne De Groot

Bibliographic record

VenueSchool Libraries Worldwide · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Information Literacy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchool libraryPerspective (graphical)Face (sociological concept)SociologyPedagogyLibrary scienceMathematics educationPsychologyComputer scienceSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores the story of two Canadian school library educators and their experiences in one online program over the past ten years. Beginning with stories from the authors own school library experiences and teacher-librarianship education, the paper moves on to explore the successes and challenges of an online teacher-librarianship program. The authors discuss the impact of technology on the learning and teaching experiences. They also highlight some tensions and challenges and opportunities for the future of school library education in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.020
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchool Libraries WorldwideSame topicLibrary Science and Information LiteracyFrench-language works237,207