Local neuronal excitation and global inhibition during epileptic fast ripples in humans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Understanding the neuronal basis of epileptiform activity is a major challenge in neurology. Interictal epileptiform discharges are associated with fast ripples (FRs, >200 Hz) in the local field potential (LFP) and are a promising marker of the epileptogenic zone. Here, by using a novel hybrid macro-micro depth electrode, combining classic depth recording of LFP and two or three tetrodes enabling up to 15 neurons in local circuits to be recorded simultaneously, we have characterized neuronal responses to FRs on the same hybrid and other electrodes targeting other brain regions. While FRs were associated with increased neuronal activity in local circuits only, they were followed by inhibition in large-scale networks. Neuronal responses to FRs were homogeneous in local networks but differed across brain areas. Similarly, post-FR inhibition varied across recording locations and subjects and was shorter than typical inter-FR intervals, suggesting that this inhibition is a fundamental refractory process for the networks. These findings demonstrate that FRs engage local and global networks and point to network features that pave the way for new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".