Vers une compréhension de l’intentionnalité de l’action d’accueillir
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accueillir est devenu un geste automatisé et internalisé pour lequel on ne s’interroge plus. Pourtant, ce primo-moment laisse des traces et influencera le devenir de la relation thérapeutique. Notre souhait est de replacer l’expérience de l’accueil au cœur de la clinique en explorant les actions mises en place par des professionnels exerçant en unités de crise et d’urgences psychiatriques. À partir de l’analyse par théorisation enracinée, nous vous proposons de comprendre, décrire et modéliser le processus d’accueillir en clinique de crise et de l’urgence. Les résultats ouvrent la réflexion sur le façonnage réciproque qu’induit l’accueil. Il ne relève pas de techniques spécifiques, mais plutôt d’attitudes, voire d’aptitudes singulières, de façons d’être avec, de façons de faire avec ses émotions, de façons de faire avec le patient et son entourage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".