MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3200603678 · doi:10.1063/5.0066526

Socializing conservation - An integrated approach towards sustaining built heritage of the ancient quarter (Hanoi, Vietnam)

2021· article· en· W3200603678 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hung Ngo Minh

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)ArchitectureSustainable developmentIdentity (music)Order (exchange)VernacularUrban planningCivil engineeringArchaeologyGeographyArchitectural engineeringEnvironmental planningHistoryEngineeringPolitical scienceBusinessArtAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hanoi’s Ancient Quarter, known as 36 Old Streets Quarter is a site of valued relics dating over ten centuries. Recent urban transformations have changed its structure, affecting its identity and lifestyles. Preserving tangible and intangible values of the old streets, and especially its vernacular architecture, the tube-houses (nhà ống), are matters of urgency. Urban development is being changed town structure and caused social problems losing its initiative identity. To answer questions “What, Why and How?” so the aim of this paper is to discover historical and urban development process of the Ancient Quarter as well as to review and evaluate social and community’s efforts in last ten years by applying “dots analytic system”. In order to socialize preservation works, some key solutions of sustainable urban development and design are proposed in order to positively conserve and develop original image “Ancient Quarter” of Hanoi City towards sustainable urban development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedings→Same topicCultural Heritage Management and Preservation→French-language works237,207→