MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200605966 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2021.3111106

Convergence of the Resistive Coupling-Based Waveform Relaxation Method for Chains of Identical and Symmetric Circuits

2021· article· en· W3200605966 on OpenAlexafffund
Tarik Menkad, Anestis Dounavis

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWaveformConvergence (economics)MathematicsCoupling (piping)Relaxation (psychology)Spectral radiusTopology (electrical circuits)Operator (biology)Mathematical analysisElectronic circuitIterative methodResistive touchscreenApplied mathematicsAlgorithmPhysicsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsComputer scienceCombinatoricsVoltageQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The convergence of the waveform relaxation (WR) method is demonstrated for a class of circuits: Chains of identical and symmetrical passive subcircuits. The WR algorithm uses resistive coupling to implement the iteration. Every part is modeled as a symmetric and reciprocal linear two-port network. The iteration matrices of the WR operator are constructed for the Gauss-Jacobi and Gauss-Seidel relaxations in the Fourier domain. An upperbound estimate of the spectral radius of the WR operator is presented. It demonstrates the convergence of the method independently of the number of cascaded parts in the chain and the coupling resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular PapersSame topicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207