MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multi-Kernel Deformable 3D Convolution for Video Super-Resolution

2021· article· en· W3200637159 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKernel (algebra)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceConvolution (computer science)Computer visionFuse (electrical)Image resolutionMotion estimationPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial neural networkMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Video super-resolution (VSR) methods align and fuse consecutive low-resolution frames to generate high-resolution frames. One of the main difficulties for VSR process is that video contains various motions, and the accuracy of motion estimation greatly affects the quality of video restoration. Diverse receptive fields in temporal and spatial dimensions have the potential to adapt to various motions, which is rarely paid attention in most known VSR methods. In this paper, we propose to provide adaptive receptive fields for VSR model. Firstly, we design a multi-kernel 3D convolution network and integrate it with a multi-kernel deformable convolution network for motion estimation and multiple frames alignment. Secondly, we propose a 2D multi-kernel convolution framework to improve texture restoration quality. Our experimental results show that the proposed framework outperforms the state-of-the-art VSR methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Image Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207