MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200640745 · doi:10.3849/aimt.01237

Real-time Optimal Control of Multi-wheeled Combat Vehicles - using Artificial Neural Network and Potential Fields

2018· article· en· W3200640745 on OpenAlexaff
Amr Mohamed, M. EI-Gindy, Xishi Huang, Jing Ren, Haoxiang Lang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Military Technology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeading (navigation)Artificial neural networkWorkspaceComputer sciencePath (computing)Control (management)Motion planningPosition (finance)Point (geometry)RobotEngineeringArtificial intelligenceSimulationControl engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a real-time path planning algorithm for autonomous multi-wheeled combat vehicles using Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Artificial Potential Fields (APFs) and optimal control theory. Real-time navigation of autonomous vehicles is a very complex problem and it is crucial for many military operations. This paper proposes an optimal control and ANN approach for a dynamic model of the multi-wheeled combat vehicle to generate the possible optimal paths that cover every part of the workspace. Consequently, the obtained paths are used to train the proposed ANN model. The trained ANN has the capability to control the movement of combat vehicle in real time from any starting point to the desired goal position within the area of interest. The vehicle path is autonomously generated from the previous vehicle location parameter in terms of lateral velocity, heading angle and yaw rate of the vehicle. APF is proposed for preventing the vehicle from colliding with obstacles in border destination. The effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed approach are demonstrated in the simulation results, which show that the proposed ANN model is capable of navigating the multi-wheeled combat vehicle in real time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.674

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Military TechnologySame topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207