Peran Perempuan Rifaiyah Mempertahankan Ajaran Islam Rifa’iyah: Studi Kasus di Pati Jawa Tengah
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dalam riset ini, data diperoleh melalui literatur, observasi, dan wawancara dengan tokoh dan warga Rifaiyah di Tambangsari, Kedungwinong, Sukolilo, Pati, Jawa Tengah. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif kualitatif. Tujuan ditulisnya naskah ini untuk memberi fakta bahwa jamaah Rifaiyah masih eksis hingga kini karena dilestarikan oleh generasi santrinya dengan mengkaji Kitab Tarjumah, karya K.H. Ahmad Rifai dan keberadaan Pondok Pesantren Rifaiyah. Hasil riset menunjukkan, bahwa lestarinyajamaah Rifaiyah di Dukuh Tambangsari hingga kini karena adanya peran seorang perempuan sebagai generasi penerus Rifaiyah. Ia adalah salah seorang cucu dari K.H. Ahmad Rifai, cikal bakal kiai/guru Rifaiyah yang mengenalkan Rifaiyah di Dukuh Tambangsari bernama K. Hannan. Adapun peran K. Hannan pada saat itu, antara lain: (1) sebagai pendakwah perempuan pada forum pengajian umum di wilayah Kabupaten Pati dan pengajian rutin dalam organisasi keagamaan di Dukuh Tambangsari; (2) sebagaiguru Taman Pendidikan Al-Qur’an di Dukuh Tambangsari; dan (3) mengaji Kitab Tarjumah.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".