MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200670349 · doi:10.1021/acsanm.1c01970

Printed Chemiresistive In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> Nanoparticle-Based Sensors with ppb Detection of H<sub>2</sub>S Gas for Food Packaging

2021· article· en· W3200670349 on OpenAlexafffund
Ahmad Al Shboul, Ricardo Izquierdo

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Nano Materials · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersMitacs
KeywordsNanocompositeCopper sulfideNanoparticleMaterials scienceIndiumHydrogen sulfideCopperHydrogen sulfide sensorRelative humiditySulfideNanotechnologyChemical engineeringChemistryOptoelectronicsMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cost-effective and disposable smart sensing technologies capable of monitoring packaged foods’ degradation are necessary for human health and the growing processed-food industry. Herein, highly sensitive and selective hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) gas sensors were fabricated from solution-printed nanocomposites comprising indium oxide nanoparticles (In 2 O 3 NPs), graphite flakes (Gt), polystyrene (PS), and copper acetate monohydrate (CuAc). The standard In 2 O 3 NP-based sensor (SS, without CuAc) showed H 2 S detection ≈100 ppb under ambient conditions. The presence of CuAc resulted in a highly sensitive nanocomposite layer enabling the detection of lower than 100 ppb (<100 ppb) concentrations of H 2 S gas levels, far superior to the standard In 2 O 3 NP-based nanocomposite. Adding CuAc to the In 2 O 3 NP-based nanocomposite as a modifying additive leads to copper sulfide (CuS) formation owing to its reaction with H 2 S gas. CuS significantly enhances the nanocomposite layer’s conductivity and H 2 S reactions on the sensors’ surface, resulting in a substantial reduction in electrical resistance for sensors. The modified In 2 O 3 NP-based sensor presents remarkable enhancement in their selectivity toward H 2 S gas detection when evaluated against various hazardous vapors. Furthermore, the modified In 2 O 3 NP-based sensors possess good anti-humid property under highly humid conditions (≈80% relative humidity).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Nano MaterialsSame topicGas Sensing Nanomaterials and SensorsFrench-language works237,207