MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

First Direct Measurement of an Astrophysical <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math>-Process Reaction Cross Section Using a Radioactive Ion Beam

2021· article· en· W3200723824 on OpenAlexafffund
G. Lotay, S. A. Gillespie, M. Williams, T. Rauscher, M. Alcorta, A. M. Amthor, C. Andreoiu, D. Baal, G. C. Ball, S. S. Bhattacharjee, Hadi Behnamian, V. Bildstein, C. Burbadge, W. N. Catford, D. T. Doherty, N. E. Esker, F. H. Garcia, A. B. Garnsworthy, G. Hackman, S. Hallam, Kevan Hudson, S. Jazrawi, Eva Kasanda, A. Kennington, Yeo Hyung Kim, A. Lennarz, R. S. Lubna, C. R. Natzke, Nobuya Nishimura, B. Olaizola, C. Paxman, A. Psaltis, C. E. Svensson, J. Williams, B. Wallis, D. Yates, D. Walter, B. Davids

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of GuelphSimon Fraser UniversityMcMaster UniversityTRIUMF
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of GuelphEuropean Cooperation in Science and TechnologyNational Research Council CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilTRIUMF
KeywordsPhysicsCross section (physics)Kinetic energySection (typography)ProjectileSupernovaNuclear physicsEnergy (signal processing)AstrophysicsComputer scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have performed the first direct measurement of the ^{83}Rb(p,γ) radiative capture reaction cross section in inverse kinematics using a radioactive beam of ^{83}Rb at incident energies of 2.4 and 2.7A MeV. The measured cross section at an effective relative kinetic energy of E_{cm}=2.393 MeV, which lies within the relevant energy window for core collapse supernovae, is smaller than the prediction of statistical model calculations. This leads to the abundance of ^{84}Sr produced in the astrophysical p process being higher than previously calculated. Moreover, the discrepancy of the present data with theoretical predictions indicates that further experimental investigation of p-process reactions involving unstable projectiles is clearly warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207