ILAE Neuroimaging Task Force Highlight: harnessing optimized imaging protocols for drug‐resistant childhood epilepsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ILAE Neuroimaging Task Force aims to publish educational case reports highlighting basic aspects related to neuroimaging in epilepsy consistent with the educational mission of the ILAE. Previous quantitative MRI studies have established important imaging markers of epilepsy-related pathology, including features sensitive to hippocampal cell loss and reactive astrogliosis. Here, we review the case of a female with pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy. Throughout her course of treatment, she had seven MRI investigations at several centers; the first three did not follow optimized epilepsy imaging protocols whereas the remaining four adhered to HARNESS-MRI protocols ( har monized n euroimaging of e pilepsy s tructural s equences). Visual inspection of a set of HARNESS-MR images revealed conspicuous left hippocampal hyperintensity which may have been initially overlooked on non-optimized MR images. Quantitative analysis of these multimodal imaging data along hippocampal subfields provided clear evidence of hippocampal sclerosis, with increased atrophy, increased mean diffusivity, increased T2-FLAIR signal, and lower qT1 values observed in the anterior portions of the left, compared to the right hippocampus. The patient underwent a left anterior temporal lobectomy with amygdalohippocampectomy at age 16 years. Histopathology of the resected specimen also confirmed hippocampal sclerosis with widespread gliosis and focal neuronal loss in the hippocampal subfields overlapping with regions of multimodal quantitative alterations. The patient remains seizure-free one year after surgery. Collectively, this case highlights the need for optimized data acquisition protocols early in the treatment of epilepsy and supports quantitative analysis of MRI contrasts to enhance personalized diagnosis and prognosis of drug-resistant patients with epilepsy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.019 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".