MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fractional PID Controller Tuning Using Krill Herd for Renewable Power Systems Control

2021· article· en· W3200790904 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFrequency Control in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPID controllerRenewable energyControl theory (sociology)Energy storageController (irrigation)Electric power systemFlywheelAutomatic frequency controlAutomatic Generation ControlFlywheel energy storageComputer scienceControl engineeringEngineeringPower (physics)Automotive engineeringTemperature controlControl (management)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the optimization of the Fractional Order PID controller (FOPID) parameters used to control the frequency and power deviation of hybrid power system based renewable energy generation. This proposed system consists of renewable energy generation like wind and photovoltaic systems with conventional sources such as diesel generator and fuel cell along with Energy Storage Systems (Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) and Flywheel Energy Storage Systems (FESS)). The Krill Herd algorithm is used to determine the gains parameters of the Fractional Order PID controller. The scope of this paper is to eliminate the frequency and power deviation to provide stability of the proposed system. The obtained results show that the proposed controller enhances the system stability performance in comparison with the PID controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFrequency Control in Power SystemsFrench-language works237,207