MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200802708 · doi:10.1109/jstars.2021.3112623

Spatial Gap-Filling of SMAP Soil Moisture Pixels Over Tibetan Plateau via Machine Learning Versus Geostatistics

2021· article· en· W3200802708 on OpenAlexaff
Cheng Tong, Hongquan Wang, Ramata Magagi, Kalifa Goı̈ta, Ke Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceGeostatisticsWater contentBrightness temperatureMean squared errorRemote sensingPlateau (mathematics)MoistureSoil scienceSatelliteKrigingSpatial variabilityAtmospheric sciencesBrightnessMeteorologyMathematicsGeologyComputer scienceMachine learningGeographyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) satellite provides global soil moisture products with reliable accuracy since 2015. However, significant gaps of SMAP soil moisture appeared over Tibetan Plateau. To address this issue, we proposed two methods, machine learning and geostatistics technique to fill the spatial gaps of SMAP L3 soil moisture. For the machine learning technique, we train a Random Forest algorithm which aims to match the output of available SMAP L3 soil moisture using a series of input variables such as SMAP brightness temperature (TBH, TBV) in ascending orbits, surface temperature, MODIS NDVI, land cover, DEM and other auxiliary data. Then, the established RF estimators were applied to the SMAP brightness temperature from descending orbits to reconstruct complete soil moisture data over the Tibetan Plateau. For the geostatistics technique, the Ordinary Kriging was applied to the available SMAP L3 soil moisture pixels to interpolate complete soil moisture data. To cross-validate the performances of the algorithms, we assume certain areas with available SMAP SM values as missing, and then compared the gap-filling results with the actual ones. The cross-validations show that the gap-filling results from two algorithms were highly correlated to the SMAP official SM products with high coefficients of determination (R2_RF = 0.97, R2_OK = 0.85) and low RMSE (RMSE_RF = 0.015 cm3/cm3, RMSE_OK = 0.036 cm3/cm3). Furthermore, the gap-filling soil moisture data present a better correlation with the SMOS soil moisture data (R = 0.55 ~ 0.7) than the GLDAS simulations (R = 0.18 ~ 0.62).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score0.713

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote SensingSame topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207