MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200807199 · doi:10.33423/ajm.v20i3.3109

Working Capital Management and Level of Countries’ Corruption: A Panel Study of ASEAN Countries

2020· article· en· W3200807199 on OpenAlexaff
Ebrahim Mansoori, Amjad Pirotti, Andrew Craik, Reza Ghazal

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Management · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicWorking Capital and Financial Performance
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLanguage changeSample (material)Panel dataOrdinary least squaresWorking capitalBusinessInvestment (military)Cash conversion cycleCashCapital (architecture)EconomicsCash managementFinanceEconometricsPolitical scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aims to clarify the relationship between working capital management and the level of countries’ corruption. This study uses a large panel sample of five ASEAN countries; Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Thailand, and the Philippines over the period 2005–2017 using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimators. The results indicate that the length of the cash conversion cycle will decrease as a result of increasing the level of corruption indexes. Meanwhile, a high level of corruption indexes forces the managers for the sample firms decrease the level of investment in cash equivalents and cash.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.274
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of ManagementSame topicWorking Capital and Financial PerformanceFrench-language works237,207