MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200819132 · doi:10.58459/icce.2012.889

Design Principles for a Pedagogically-Sound Mobile-Enabled Language Learning System

2012· article· en· W3200819132 on OpenAlexaffabout
Agnieszka Palalas

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Computers in Education · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Learning in Education
Canadian institutionsGeorge Brown College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSound (geography)Human–computer interactionMultimediaAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper provides a brief overview of a longitudinal Design-Based Research study conducted with ESP students and practitioners at a Canadian college. The study resulted in two key outcomes, namely the Mobile-Enabled Language Learning EcoSystem and corresponding design principles. The design guidelines presented in this paper focus on the pedagogical aspects of the mobile-enabled intervention viewed through an ecological lens. The purpose of this paper is to introduce practical guidelines for language teachers and instructional designers who seek to develop m-learning solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference on Computers in EducationSame topicMobile Learning in EducationFrench-language works237,207