Wildcatite, CaFe3+Te6+O5(OH), the second new tellurate mineral from the Detroit district, Juab County, Utah
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Wildcatite (IMA2020–019) is a new calcium–iron(III) tellurate discovered at the Wildcat prospect in the Detroit district, Juab County, Utah. Wildcatite may take on a variety of appearances, ranging from transparent orange to brown coatings or masses to earthy, white polycrystalline coatings filling jasperoid fracture surfaces. Coatings of wildcatite are generally less than 0.1 mm thick and may cover up to 5 cm2, while nanoscale crystallites of wildcatite may form translucent red-brown “crystals” up to 0.1 mm. Wildcatite is found associated with gold, calcite, aragonite, native tellurium, manganese oxides, iron oxides, rare clinobisvanite, beyerite, coronadite, the Te oxides paratellurite and tellurite, and the Te oxysalts andymcdonaldite, burckhardtite, carlfriesite, eckhardite, frankhawthorneite, khinite, mcalpineite, tlapallite, and xocolatlite. The strongest powder diffraction lines are [dobsÅ(Iobs)(hkl)]: 3.33(100)(011), 2.60(55)(110), 2.30(59)(111), 2.05(33)(021), and 1.80(88)(112). The average size of wildcatite crystallites is 13 nm, thus the crystal structure of wildcatite was solved by Rietveld refinement, converging to a final RB value of 3.14%. The empirical formula of wildcatite, as determined by electron probe microanalysis and Rietveld refinement, is Ca0.98Bi3+0.02Pb0.01Fe3+0.73Mg0.05Mn2+0.02Zn0.01Cu0.00Te6+1.15Sb5+0.02Si0.01O5.44H0.56, simplified to the ideal formula of CaFe3+Te6+O5(OH). Wildcatite is trigonal, crystallizing in the space group P1m, with a = 5.2003(14) Å, c = 4.9669(14) Å, V = 116.3(1) Å3 and Z = 1. Wildcatite is structurally very similar to rosiaite (PbSb2O6), possessing a honeycomb-like two-dimensional framework of edge-sharing Fe3+O6 and Te6+O6 octahedra, sandwiching octahedrally coordinated Ca2+ cations. Minor OH substitution (∼10%) at the O sites is required for charge balance in wildcatite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".