Survol des décisions canadiennes importantes rendues en matière de secret commercial en 2020
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les decisions rendues au Canada en 2020 illustrent les limites du soutien qu’il est permis d’attendre des tribunaux en matiere d’atteinte au secret commercial. L’analyse se consacre particulierement a quatre d’entre elles, prononcees dans des dossiers divers : une demande d’ordonnance de type Norwich visant Costco Wholesale Canada Ltd, une demande de communication d’un contrat conclu sans appel d’offres public par le ministere des Transports du Quebec, une ordonnance de sauvegarde pour valoir contre un ex-employe et les entreprises au sein desquelles il exerce maintenant ses activites, puis le plus recent chapitre de la saga Equustek, qui confirme maintes atteintes aux droits de l’entreprise britanno-colombienne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".