MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3200889866 · doi:10.5539/jas.v13n10p15

Genetic Analysis of New Maize Hybrids for Yield and Resistance to Aflatoxin Accumulation

2021· article· en· W3200889866 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Allen Oppong, Abu Mustapha Dadzie, Beatrice Elohor Ifie, Maxwell Darko Asante, Ruth Prempeh, Linda A. Abrokwah, Zipporah Appiah Kubi, Esther Agyemang Marfo, Esther A. Ananng, Marilyn L. Warburton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUnited States Agency for International Development
KeywordsAflatoxinHybridGermplasmAspergillus flavusBiologyCropMycotoxinAgronomyInoculationHorticultureBiotechnologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maize (Zea mays L.) is the most important cereal crop in sub-Saharan Africa providing food for many of its inhabitants. However, production is hampered by low yields and aflatoxin contamination, among others. The toxin contaminates maize before harvest and during storage. Ghana lacks regulatory infrastructure for monitoring and detecting aflatoxin in grains prior to market, and most of the local maize varieties have been found to be susceptible to aflatoxin accumulation. Host resistance is envisaged as a key approach in addressing the aflatoxin menace. Thus, this study was conducted to identify new hybrids that combine high yield with resistance to aflatoxin accumulation as well as study the mode of gene controlling tolerance to aflatoxin accumulation. Sixteen aflatoxin resistant inbreds from exotic sources were crossed as males to 10 local germplasm in a North Carolina II design to generate 160 new hybrids. These were planted together with 9 checks using a 13 × 13 alpha lattice with three replications. The new hybrids were evaluated across six environments in two seasons. Five plants each per hybrid were inoculated with a local strain of Aspergillus flavus at a concentration of 9 × 107conidia/ml. Ninety-six out of the 169 crosses were analyzed statistically. Significant effect of environment and genotypes for all traits especially, for aflatoxin accumulation resistance and yield were observed. The general combining ability effect of males for all traits were found significant (P < 0.05) whereas that of the females were not significant for all traits. Inbreds with consistent significant negative GCA effect for aflatoxin reduction were identified (MP715, TZI8, MP719). Furthermore, the underlying genetic control for the aflatoxin accumulation resistance trait was found to be via both GCA and SCA effects. Heritability estimates were moderate, suggesting permissible transfer of traits during selection to create high yielding aflatoxin resistant hybrids for consumers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural Science→Same topicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food→French-language works237,207→