MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200907787 · doi:10.7202/1081111ar

“The Eternal Triangle of Barrie Moviedom”

2021· article· en· W3200907787 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Aaron E. Armstrong

Bibliographic record

VenueOntario History · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMovie theaterPer capitaRural areaMedia studiesSociologyHistoryAestheticsArtAdvertisingVisual artsPolitical scienceBusinessLawDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Between 1908 and 1938, Barrie went from having no permanent movie theatres to the city with the most per capita in the county. Barrie not only furnished a sizable audience, but one large enough to sustain multiple theatres that seated 600, reinforcing the importance of studying rural audiences. By examining the development of cinema, the struggles between theatre operators, and how local audiences interacted with the new medium it becomes clear that people in Barrie and comparable rural municipalities engaged with cinema in similar but not identical ways as those in large urban centres. This study shifts the current dialogue from one of metropole imposing change on the periphery to a better understanding of rural theatre culture as a unique entity worthy of study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOntario HistorySame topicCinema and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207