Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clinical cobalt therapy units and MV linear accelerators were introduced nearly simultaneously in the early 1950s. e rst two clinical cobalt therapy units were installed in October 1951 in Saskatoon and London, Ontario (Litt 2000). e rst MV linear accelerator installed solely for clinical use was at Hammersmith Hospital, London in June 1952 (Bernier et al. 2004). In August 1953, the rst patient was treated with this machine. e deeply penetrating ionizing photon beams quickly became the mainstay of radiation therapy, allowing the widespread noninvasive treatment of deep-seated tumors. An additional advantage of these photon beams was based on the fact that photons deliver most of their dose through the interactions of highly energeticscattered electrons. e dose delivery properties of the photon/ scattered electron system leave the patient’s skin surface with a considerably lower dose than inside the body. is allowed aggressive doses to be used internally while sparing the skin from severe radiation damage. Consequently, this feature was called skin sparing and played an important role in the clinical utility of linear-accelerator and cobalt-beam therapies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it