MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200959956 · doi:10.17632/vg93bvf48h.1

Raman lidar data from Capel Dewi, May 23 - 30 2016

2018· article· en· W3200959956 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Systems and Laser Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLidarRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyGeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

These lidar data show the passage of smoke from forest fires in Canada over the lidar site at Capel Dewi near Aberystwyth in Wales. A description of the event is provided in Vaughan et al, Atmos. Chem. Phys., DOI: 10.5194/acp-2017-1181. The files contain the photon-counting signals from the lidar as count-rate*height in km squared (corrected for background and pulse pileup), statistical errors in those signals, and synthetic molecular atmosphere profiles derived from two representative radiosonde stations in the vicinity. The counts have been integrated in time over a night, as follows: May23: 2148 on 23 May to 0309 on 24 May May24: 2126 on 24 May to 2206 on 24 May May26: 2304 on 26 May to 2344 on 26 May May29: 2111 on 29 May to 0331 on 30 May May30: 0036 on 31 May to 0257 on 31 May Cloud prevented night-long observations on these nights - cloud-free profiles were selected and combined by visual examination of the raw data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it