MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200992941

Carboniferous and Permian of the world : Memoir 19

2002· article· en· W3200992941 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
L. V. Hills, C M Henderson, E W Bamber

Bibliographic record

VenueOSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarboniferousStratigraphyPaleontologySedimentologyGeologyPermianSupercontinentPalynologyPaleozoicGeologistMemoirStratotypeCyclothemsArchaeologyPennsylvanianGeographyHistoryStage (stratigraphy)Art history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This conference highlighted more than one million years of geologic history from the period when the Pangea supercontinent came into being. The conference was attended by approximately 265 international participants. A wide range of disciplines was covered, ranging from sedimentology to stratigraphy, resources, as well as paleontology. This document includes 56 papers presented at the conference. The compilation of these papers should prove particularly useful to geoscientists, both in Canada and around the world. Some of the topics discussed during the conference included: carboniferous palynology and megaflora, carboniferous sedimentology and stratigraphy of eastern North America, formation, Cyclothems from Western Canada, the United States and Spain (7 papers). The volume was divided into a number of themes, and the papers were arranged alphabetically within each theme. refs., tabs., figs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207