MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3201059555

Measuring Deformations in a CANDU 6 Concrete Containment Structure

2001· article· en· W3201059555 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Malcolm Gray, Arshad Ahmad Khan, B. Shenton, Medhat Elgohary

Bibliographic record

VenueNCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContainment (computer programming)Forensic engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CANDU TM 6 reactor system is contained within a post-tensioned concrete containment structure.The New Brunswick Power (NBP) owned, Point Lepreau CANDU TM 6 Generating Station (PLGS) located in New Brunswick, Canada, has been in service since 1983.Investigations are being undertaken to evaluate the significance of any age-related degradation.Particularly, a survey is being conducted to assess the expected long term performance of the structure.For part of this survey, in-situ deformations that occur during normal reactor operation and a leak-rate test, for which the structure is internally pressurized, are being measured.During the early life of the structure, deformations were measured using both embedded and surface mounted gauges on the concrete surfaces.The record shows that neither of these strategies provided results which can be used to evaluate the current stress conditions.A reason for this may be related to the type of instrumentation used.Subsequently, various types of commercially available instruments have been appraised for application at PLGS.Laboratory and in-situ tests on mechanical, vibrating wire and fibre-optic deformation measuring devices confirm that the accuracy of the measurements can be expected to vary significantly between instrument types.In addition, for each instrument type, the instrument stiffness, the temperature and the manner in which the instrument is installed all strongly influence output.Recently, three gauge types were retrofitted to the outside surfaces of the PLGS containment structure to provide a further assessment of the usefulness of the instrumentation and, ultimately, the condition of the structure.Taking the determining factors of instrument type and environment into account, measurements were made during and following a leak-rate test.These tests have shown that all of the instrument types can be used to assess the condition of the structure.It is shown that concrete containment structure is required to endure distortional stresses due to environmental conditions.It is concluded that monitoring of deformations occurring in concrete containment structures during the leak-rate pressure tests as well as continuously over the period of their operating life is an essential element in a structural ageing management program. BACKGROUNDIn the mid 1990's, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) and New Brunswick Power (NBP) initiated a series of investigations to determine the neeA for a Plant Life Management Program (PLiM) at Point Lepreau Generating Station.Recently, a program was designed to provide the basis for a statement of "fitness for service" for the structures partially through measurements on the concrete containment.The plan included activities designed to provide details for an ageing management program (AMP) and an assessment of the condition of the structures.The physical installation of instrumentation on the concrete containment structure was required for both of these purposes.Part of the proposed in-situ work was recently completed.This paper presents a summary of the ageing management program, the physical condition survey and the monitoring scheme designed to evaluate the effects of age-related change, if any, for the containment structure.The monitoring program carried out during and following a leak rate pressure test is briefly described.For the latter, instruments were installed on the exterior surfaces of the containment structure at PLGS, and measurements were taken during a leak-rate (pressure) test.A brief summary of some of the test results is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.151
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries)Same topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207