Measuring Deformations in a CANDU 6 Concrete Containment Structure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The CANDU TM 6 reactor system is contained within a post-tensioned concrete containment structure.The New Brunswick Power (NBP) owned, Point Lepreau CANDU TM 6 Generating Station (PLGS) located in New Brunswick, Canada, has been in service since 1983.Investigations are being undertaken to evaluate the significance of any age-related degradation.Particularly, a survey is being conducted to assess the expected long term performance of the structure.For part of this survey, in-situ deformations that occur during normal reactor operation and a leak-rate test, for which the structure is internally pressurized, are being measured.During the early life of the structure, deformations were measured using both embedded and surface mounted gauges on the concrete surfaces.The record shows that neither of these strategies provided results which can be used to evaluate the current stress conditions.A reason for this may be related to the type of instrumentation used.Subsequently, various types of commercially available instruments have been appraised for application at PLGS.Laboratory and in-situ tests on mechanical, vibrating wire and fibre-optic deformation measuring devices confirm that the accuracy of the measurements can be expected to vary significantly between instrument types.In addition, for each instrument type, the instrument stiffness, the temperature and the manner in which the instrument is installed all strongly influence output.Recently, three gauge types were retrofitted to the outside surfaces of the PLGS containment structure to provide a further assessment of the usefulness of the instrumentation and, ultimately, the condition of the structure.Taking the determining factors of instrument type and environment into account, measurements were made during and following a leak-rate test.These tests have shown that all of the instrument types can be used to assess the condition of the structure.It is shown that concrete containment structure is required to endure distortional stresses due to environmental conditions.It is concluded that monitoring of deformations occurring in concrete containment structures during the leak-rate pressure tests as well as continuously over the period of their operating life is an essential element in a structural ageing management program.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".