Ground-Roll Attenuation Using a Dual-Filter-Bank Convolutional Neural Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ground-roll attenuation is very challenging because of its high amplitudes and overlapping frequency content with desired signals. A particular challenge is to recover weak reflections underneath strong masking ground-roll. We propose a dual-filter bank setup combined with two convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to realize ground-roll attenuation. The rationale for using a dual-filter bank strategy is that it permits using two CNNs with different input kernel sizes and different complexities to recognize and extract broad-scale (low-wavelength) and narrow-scale (high-wavelength) features separately. We also apply a frequency filter to create a preliminary separation between the signal and the noise. In addition, we use a radial trace transform that focuses desired signal to a smaller area, facilitating separation of the reflections and ground-roll and accelerating training. The network training strategy combines synthetic and field data examples, in addition to noise injection to augment the number of available training samples. Tests on synthetic and field datasets show that the proposed strategy achieves superior ground-roll attenuation compared with standard methods, even in the case of data with irregular spatial spacing or ground-roll characteristics not contained in the training data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".