Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il est difficile de comprendre les changements majeurs en éducation à moins d’opérer un certain recul et d’épouser une vision plus large quant au paradigme dominant de gestion. Dans ce texte, on présentera quelques fondements théoriques sur la nouvelle gestion publique (NGP), paradigme de gestion à la base de la plupart des nouvelles réformes éducatives. Les principes peuvent se résumer à quelques mots : participation décisionnelle accrue des usagers vus comme consommateurs et électeurs, obligation de résultats quantifiables, décentralisation, imputabilité accrue, mise en place de cadres de contrôle. Il faut, dans l’application de la NGP en éducation, tenir compte de quelques constats tels que l’obligation de la mesure de la performance du système éducatif dans le contexte de la mondialisation, la reconnaissance de l’individualité de la personne, le rôle croissant des parents, les limites à l’absorption du changement et enfin l’émergence de la professionnalisation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".