MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3201173787 · doi:10.1016/j.rinam.2021.100185

Polynomial degree reduction in the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" id="d1e65" altimg="si4.svg"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="script">L</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> -norm on a symmetric interval for the canonical basis

2021· article· lv· W3201173787 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Applied Mathematics · 2021
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldComputer Science
TopicNumerical Methods and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsScalable Vector GraphicsDegree (music)Reduction (mathematics)MathematicsPolynomialDiscrete mathematicsCombinatoricsComputer sciencePhysicsGeometryWorld Wide WebMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop a direct formula for determining the coefficients in the canonical basis of the best polynomial of degree M that approximates a polynomial of degree N>M on a symmetric interval for the L2-norm. We also formally prove that using the formula is more computationally efficient than using a classical matrix multiplication approach and we provide an example to illustrate that it is more numerically stable than the classical approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it