The Early Cretaceous tectonic evolution of the southern Great Xing’an Range, northeastern China: new constraints from A2-type granite and monzodiorite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The widespread Early Cretaceous plutons intruding along the southern Great Xing’an Range (SGXR) provide evidence for tectonic evolution of the region. Petrological, geochemical, zircon U–Pb geochronology, and zircon Hf isotopic studies are conducted on intrusions from Bianjiadayuan and Hongling areas. These suites classify as A2-type granites and monzodiorites, respectively. The 138–133 Ma A2-type granites originated from partial melting of continental crustal materials at high temperatures and shallow depths with significant addition of juvenile mafic lower crust sourced from a metasomatized mantle. The 136–134 Ma monzodiorites originated from the partial melting of an enriched mantle that was modified by melts of a previously subducted slab coupled with crustal contamination. The Early Cretaceous magmatism in the SGXR occurred in two periods: ∼145–136 Ma (peak at ∼139 Ma; εHf (t) = 5 to 10) and ∼136–130 Ma (peak at ∼131 Ma; εHf (t) = –10 to 15). The Early Cretaceous granite–monzodiorite suite in the SGXR suggests a bimodal magmatism in an extensional setting. The ∼145–130 Ma magmatism may have been triggered by asthenospheric upwelling induced by the Mongol–Okhotsk oceanic slab breakoff and large-scale lithospheric delamination resulting from post-orogenic extension. The variation of subduction direction of the Paleo-Pacific Ocean likely triggered a change in stress regime at ca. 136 Ma and likely promoted the lithospheric delamination beneath the SGXR resulting in intense magmatism originating from various sources. As such, the Paleo-Pacific Oceanic subduction likely played an important role in the Early Cretaceous magmatism in the SGXR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".