Dispersion curves of a slab waveguide with a nonlinear covering medium and an exponential graded-index thin film (transverse magnetic case)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A slab waveguide that comprises a linear substrate, an exponentially graded-index guiding layer, and a power-dependent refractive index covering medium is investigated. All layers are assumed dielectric. The guiding film index is described by a function n ( x ) , which changes exponentially from the cover-film interface to the substrate. The solution of the Helmholtz equation in the guiding layer is found as Bessel’s functions of the first and second kinds, the order of which is V b , where V and b are two asymmetry parameters called normalized film thickness and normalized guide index, respectively. The dispersion relation is obtained, and the dispersion properties are investigated. We found that there is no cutoff thickness for small asymmetry coefficient ( a ) values due to the nonlinear covering medium. The properties of the waveguide structure are determined by the graded-index function, and the effect of the cover layer nonlinearity is highly reduced and contributes almost nothing to the dispersion properties for large values of a . The b -values do not exceed unity, which means that the modes carried by the waveguide structure are guided modes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".