MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3201354697

Directe economische effecten van accijns op brandstof voor de Nederlandse visserijvloot

2021· article· nl· W3201354697 on OpenAlexaff
J.A.E. van Oostenbrugge, A. Mol

Bibliographic record

VenueSocio-Environmental Systems Modeling · 2021
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

de uitstoot van broeikasgassen een aanpassing van de energiebelastingrichtlijn gepresenteerd waarin nieuwe minimum accijnstarieven voor motorbrandstof worden vastgesteld. 1 Voor zowel de aquacultuur als de visserij geldt volgens artikel 8 en 15 van het voorstel dat op 14 juli 2021 werd gepresenteerd vanaf 1 januari 2023 een minimale belasting van 0,9 euro/GJoule voor alle soorten conventionele brandstof (Annex 1 tabel B), terwijl de visserij en aquacultuur nu nog een uitzondering hebben voor deze accijns.Dit is het lage accijnstarief in het voorstel; het normale tarief voor brandstofaccijns is 10,75 euro/GJoule.Het ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit wil inzicht in de economische consequenties voor de Nederlandse visserijsector van een eventuele accijnsheffing over brandstof.Zij heeft Wageningen Economic Research gevraagd een eerste indicatieve berekening te maken van de directe economische gevolgen van een accijnsheffing zoals voorgesteld in de conceptrichtlijn voor de Nederlandse visserij-en mosselvloot.De oestercultuur is buiten beschouwing gelaten vanwege gebrek aan gegevens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0920.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueSocio-Environmental Systems ModelingSame topicGlobal trade and economicsFrench-language works237,207