MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3201404925 · doi:10.33423/jhetp.v21i8.4504

Teachers Take Charge of Their Resilience Through Self-Study

2021· article· en· W3201404925 on OpenAlexaff
Tim Buttler, Holly Kay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Higher Education Theory and Practice · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicResilience and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsBurman University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResilience (materials science)Psychological resiliencePsychologyFace (sociological concept)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Professional developmentSustainabilityPedagogySociologySocial psychologyMedicineSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research arises from serious concerns surrounding teaching sustainability, given the everyday challenges teachers face as they learn and thrive. Internationally, teacher recruitment and retention are in crisis. COVID-19 has added to previous workloads resulting in many teachers describing their teaching experience as detrimental to their commitment, well-being, and health. This paper examines one teacher’s professional development efforts to promote her resilience via self-study research methodology. The findings suggest that an intentional focus on developing resilience through self-study positively impacted teaching practices. As a result, the authors suggest that teachers take charge of their resilience by conducting their own self-study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.414 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Higher Education Theory and PracticeSame topicResilience and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207