MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3201425577 · doi:10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100822

Single tracer-based protocol for broad-spectrum kinase profiling in live cells with NanoBRET

2021· article· en· W3201425577 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSTAR Protocols · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGenentechKungliga Tekniska HögskolanOntario Genomics InstituteJanssen PharmaceuticalsMerck KGaAGenome CanadaBoehringer IngelheimMcGill UniversityTakeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A.PfizerDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsTRACERProtocol (science)KinaseContext (archaeology)Computer scienceChemistryProfiling (computer programming)Computational biologyChromatographyPhysicsBiologyBiochemistryMedicineNuclear physicsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This protocol is used to profile the engagement of kinase inhibitors across nearly 200 kinases in a live-cell context. This protocol utilizes one single kinase tracer (NanoBRET(TM) Tracer K10) that operates quantitatively at four different concentrations. Minimizing the number of tracers offers a significant workflow improvement over the previous protocol that utilized a combination of 6 tracers. Each NanoBRET(TM) kinase assay is built using commercially available plasmids and has been optimized for NanoLuc tagging orientation, diluent DNA, and tracer concentration. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Vasta et al. (2018).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it