Muscle weakness precedes atrophy during cancer cachexia and is associated with muscle-specific mitochondrial stress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Muscle weakness and wasting are defining features of cancer-induced cachexia. Mitochondrial stress occurs before atrophy in certain muscles, but distinct responses between muscles and across time remains unclear. We aimed to determine the time-dependent and muscle-specific responses to Colon-26 (C26) cancer-induced cachexia in mice. At 2 weeks post-inoculation, the presence of small tumours did not alter body or muscle mass but decreased force production in the quadriceps and diaphragm. Pyruvate-supported mitochondrial respiration was lower in quadriceps while mitochondrial H 2 O 2 emission was elevated in diaphragm. At 4 weeks, large tumours corresponded to lower body mass, muscle mass, and cross-sectional area of fibers in quadriceps and diaphragm. Force production in quadriceps was unchanged but remained lower in diaphragm vs control. Mitochondrial respiration was increased while H 2 O 2 emission was unchanged in both muscles vs control. Mitochondrial creatine sensitivity was compromised in quadriceps. These findings indicate muscle weakness precedes atrophy in quadriceps and diaphragm but is linked to heterogeneous mitochondrial alterations. Eventual muscle-specific restorations in force and bioenergetics highlight how the effects of cancer on one muscle do not predict the response in another muscle. Exploring heterogeneous responses of muscles to cancer may reveal new mechanisms underlying distinct sensitivities, or resistance, to cancer cachexia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".