MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3201436197 · doi:10.33423/jabe.v23i2.4089

The Impact of the New Regulation of Public Enterprise Contracts on the Cameroonian System of Public Procurement Contracting

2021· article· en· W3201436197 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
John Eric Dicka

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Business and Economics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Issues in South Africa
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcurementDynamismBusinessAdjudicationConstructiveLaw and economicsIndustrial organizationLawEconomicsMarketingProcess (computing)Political scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since its implementation in Cameroon, the law of public procurement contracts has strongly been oriented toward the classical technique of adjudication; wich is going to develop an almost immutable machanism, a system the influence of which is much more visible on public procurement. However, the evolutionary and adaptatory character of rule of law, leads either to reevaluate certain rules, either to modify its and the public company procurement has not been able to deviate to this legal dynamism. It will no doubt have stated that the public company procurement has been placed under a new regulatory dependance that will significantly influence the game of contracting public procurement and change its configuration as it has been perceived for long time and maintained within Cameroon's positive law. It is,in fact, this legal upheaval that will produce incidence which can be identify throught this study, both in terms of organic structure and material functioning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Business and EconomicsSame topicLegal Issues in South AfricaFrench-language works237,207