MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3201466733 · doi:10.4095/328837

New core and downhole geophysical data sets from the Bells Corners Borehole Calibration Facility Ottawa, Ontario

2021· report· en· W3201466733 on OpenAlexaffabout
H Crow, Kevin Brewer, T Cartwright, S. Gaines, Dru Heagle, A J -M Pugin, H A J Russell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoreholeGeologyCalibrationCore (optical fiber)SeismologyGeophysicsGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Geological Survey of Canada's deep borehole test site at the Bells Corners Borehole Calibration Facility in Ottawa, Ontario, has been in use since the 1980's for the development and calibration of geophysical logging instrumentation. Cores from six deep boreholes (up to 300 m) are preserved and remain available for research purposes. In 2019, the facility underwent repairs to reopen deep boreholes, replace surface casings, and install atmospheric monitoring equipment. This report documents new laboratory core testing and downhole geophysical logs collected in borehole BC81-2, the most frequently logged of the boreholes at the facility. Core data sets include physical, mechanical, and hydraulic properties, nuclear magnetic resonance, and complex resistivity measurements. The downhole log suite includes televiewer imagery (optical and acoustic), total gamma, full waveform sonic, and fluid measurements (high resolution temperature, conductivity, and flow meter measurements). Digital data are provided in appendices. These data sets support ongoing collaborations at the Facility across a variety of disciplines for geological exploration, geoengineering, and hydrogeological research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207